On Monday, I watched an enthusiastic crowd respectfully acknowledge Semiahmoo First Nation Chief Harley Chappell as he delivered greetings to the crowd at SurreyÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™s Canada Day celebrations.
Orange shirts were prominent amidst the sea of red, and visitors embraced the chance to explore the Indigenous Village area on-site.
Everywhere, I saw signs that Canadians of all backgrounds are ready and eager to acknowledge our First Nations and to embrace the spirit of truth and reconciliation.
Which makes the all the more timely.
Chappell was among the leaders of three First Nations Ï㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥” the Katzie, Kwantlen and Semiahmoo Ï㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥” who in the territory known as kÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™Ê·eqÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™É™nÉ™q.
Opposition to the potential loss of the Campbell Heights property, which happens to include , has been swift and vehement.
IÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™ll admit that when the debate arose last week, my first thought was: No, we canÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™t let that land disappear, we have to save our farmland.
Should preserving agricultural land matter? Of course it should.
But itÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™s a bit rich for me to point fingers at First Nations for claiming back agricultural land as IÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™m driving in my car along highways built on agricultural land, to shops and neighbourhoods developed on agricultural land, while using a variety of products manufactured in industrial areas where agricultural land used to be.
Individuals, businesses, developers and governments at all levels have long been paving over and building on land that could have been used for farming.
To accept a generations-long history of that having been true but to now grow passionate about saving farmland from the hands of its original owners smacks of hypocrisy at best Ï㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥” and unspoken racism at worst.
We donÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™t yet know what the Katzie, Kwantlen and Semiahmoo Nations will do with the land, if and when the federal government agrees to return it.
HereÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™s the thing: We donÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™t get a say.
We donÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™t get to believe in reconciliation and impose conditions upon it.
We donÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™t get to acknowledge that this land we live on belongs to the Indigenous people it was stolen from and then say we donÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™t want Crown land to be on the table.
We donÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™t get to act like weÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™re somehow being magnanimous by giving back stolen property and then having the temerity to tell its rightful owners how to use it.
ItÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™s easy to recite the words of a land acknowledgement recognizing that this area we call Surrey and White Rock is on the unceded traditional territory of the Coast Salish peoples. ItÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™s even easy to think we believe it.
But thatÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™s the thing about reconciliation Ï㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥” itÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™s easy to believe in, in a hypothetical way.
ItÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™s when it comes to the actual, uncomfortable changes it would require us to make that it becomes less straightforward.
If our commitment to reconciliation is ever to be more than lip service, we need to let go of the land that was never ours to begin with and let the three First Nations take it from there.
Whatever discomfort or sadness or frustration we may feel about their choices doesnÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™t change a thing.
Because the alternative to reconciliation Ï㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥” honest, uncomfortable, painful reconciliation Ï㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥” is to continue on the path of colonization.
And thatÏ㽶ÊÓƵֱ²¥™s no answer at all.
Julie MacLellan is the Surrey/White Rock bureau chief for Black Press Media.