㽶Ƶֱ

Skip to content

Surrey mayor slams 㽶Ƶֱrude㽶Ƶֱ letter from Victoria bureaucrat on policing transition

Leaked letter to Mayor Brenda Locke from B.C.㽶Ƶֱs director of police services says lack of leadership on Surrey㽶Ƶֱs part is stalling policing transition
web1_230406-sul-newsurreystockimages-surreyrcmpsurreypolice_8
Surrey Police patch from Twitter Mayor Brenda Locke file photo by Anna Burns

Surrey Mayor Brenda Locke says she refuses to take marching orders from a bureaucrat in Victoria after the province㽶Ƶֱs director of police services fired off a 㽶Ƶֱrude㽶Ƶֱ letter to her on Oct. 4 protesting that a lack of leadership and engagement at Surrey City Hall is causing concerning delays to the city㽶Ƶֱs policing transition.

㽶ƵֱThe letter was disappointing but it㽶Ƶֱs inaccurate and it㽶Ƶֱs obviously trying to point blame but it㽶Ƶֱs completely inaccurate, his statements are completely inaccurate, he doesn㽶Ƶֱt know the picture on the ground and I guess the other piece is I have no idea why Glen Lewis would be writing me,㽶Ƶֱ Locke told the Now-Leader Tuesday (Oct. 10).

㽶ƵֱHe㽶Ƶֱs a bureaucrat, he should be writing bureaucrats. If the minister wants to say something to us he㽶Ƶֱs welcome to say something but it㽶Ƶֱs a little off protocol for a bureaucrat to be writing.㽶Ƶֱ

Assistant Deputy Minister Glen Lewis in his Oct. 4 letter to Locke lists 㽶Ƶֱsignificant㽶Ƶֱ work that has been taken at senior levels of government since the city was advised in July that it must continue its transition to the Surrey Police Service, but says little has been done at the municipal level.

㽶ƵֱIt is my observation that this lack of progress and delay is due in large part to a lack of leadership and engagement by City Council and City staff,㽶Ƶֱ Lewis, also director of police services, writes.

㽶ƵֱIn my view, City staff have been only minimally engaged in select aspects of this work to date and are seemingly constrained by a lack of clear direction from the Mayor and Council to progress the transition.㽶Ƶֱ

City staff 㽶Ƶֱconsistently state to its partners that they are instructed not to engage meaningfully in any work㽶Ƶֱ on the transition until council directs them to, Lewis adds.

Lewis in his letter to Locke writes 㽶ƵֱI strongly urge that the City rectify these matters forthwith and assume the leadership required to carry out its transition. To this end, I request a report back on the remedy of these items, in writing, from the City by the end of business day, October 13, 2023.㽶Ƶֱ

This rankles Locke. 㽶ƵֱHe picks a short week, first of all, so he gives us basically five business days to respond to something that㽶Ƶֱd they㽶Ƶֱve taken literally almost, what, eight, nine months to come to a conclusion on,㽶Ƶֱ she replied. 㽶ƵֱI think it㽶Ƶֱs rude and as I said, he㽶Ƶֱs a bureaucrat, he㽶Ƶֱs not going to instruct the mayor of a city what to do. I㽶Ƶֱm certainly not going to jump for a bureaucrat in Victoria.㽶Ƶֱ

Last month, following questions to SPS Chief Constable Norm Lipinski and Surrey RCMP Assistant Commissioner Brian Edwards, Locke said the 㽶Ƶֱleadership ball㽶Ƶֱ was in the province㽶Ƶֱs court and that the province 㽶Ƶֱneeds to make sure㽶Ƶֱ that there is a path forward.㽶Ƶֱ

READ MORE:

㽶ƵֱThis council has done everything asked of us and within our authority to follow through on our obligation to determine the policing model for our city,㽶Ƶֱ Locke said at the time. 㽶ƵֱMuch of the issues that we are dealing with are provincial and federal issues and that has become a lot of the stall.㽶Ƶֱ

A corporate report that came before council Sept. 11 concluded that although Public Safety Minister Mike Farnworth had directed Surrey to forge ahead with the SPS, 㽶Ƶֱoutstanding challenges remain㽶Ƶֱ and development of a 㽶Ƶֱcomprehensive framework and planning documents is necessary for any transition to SPS.㽶Ƶֱ

Farnworth ordered city council on July 19, 2023 to carry on with the transition to the SPS from the Surrey RCMP, despite council having voted 5-4 in November 2022 to maintain the Mounties as the city㽶Ƶֱs police of jurisdiction.

READ MORE:

Locke and her Surrey Connect five-member majority campaigned on keeping the RCMP.

Other claims Lewis made in his letter include:

㽶Ƶֱ Cost-increase concerns expressed by Locke to Premier David Eby 㽶Ƶֱmay be inaccurate and/or misrepresented.㽶Ƶֱ

㽶Ƶֱ The city failed to rectify its budget for the SPS following Farnworth㽶Ƶֱs July decision (in March 2023, the city allocated just $49 million to the first two quarters of the fiscal year, despite a 2023 provisional budget of approximately $160 million submitted by the Surrey Police Board last fall).

㽶Ƶֱ While Locke has 㽶Ƶֱstated publicly to the media㽶Ƶֱ that she had no input on formal terms of reference for the independent facilitator who was appointed to help facilitate the transition process, as of the letter㽶Ƶֱs date, she did not take opportunities that were provided to do so.

READ MORE:

Meantime, Surrey First Coun. Linda Annis issued a press release Oct. 6 suggesting Lewis㽶Ƶֱs letter also reinforces that 㽶Ƶֱpolitical ego㽶Ƶֱ is playing a role in stalling the policing transition.

㽶ƵֱClearly, just like local taxpayers, the provincial government has had enough of the political foot dragging from Mayor Locke,㽶Ƶֱ Annis says, noting the inaction is costing taxpayers an extra $8 million per month, through having to pay for two police forces at the same time.

㽶ƵֱThe decision to move forward with the transition to the SPS has been made, and regardless of how Brenda Locke feels about it, she has a responsibility to get on with it. Instead, we are seeing a serious and calculated lack of progress that has its roots in political ego rather than doing what㽶Ƶֱs good for Surrey.㽶Ƶֱ

Also last week, Safe Surrey Coalition councillors Doug Elford and Mandeep Nagra issued a press release attacking Locke.

㽶ƵֱMayor Locke㽶Ƶֱs leadership has been marred by inaction and a lack of clear direction. We can no longer accept excuses for the delays she has caused. It㽶Ƶֱs time for her to step up or step aside,㽶Ƶֱ Elford says.

Nagra echoed him.

㽶ƵֱWe understand the complexities of the transition, but Mayor Locke㽶Ƶֱs shocking refusal to meet with Public Safety staff to discuss Minister Mike Farnworth㽶Ƶֱs offer of $150 million in provincial cash to help with the transition is inexcusable,㽶Ƶֱ Nagra charged.

In reply to Annis, Elford and Nagra, Locke said the 㽶Ƶֱlevel of disrespect they have shown towards not only me but to council is enormous but I㽶Ƶֱm not going to respond to their comments, it㽶Ƶֱs all just political. I wish they spent more time trying to be ambassadors for this city, not constantly acting the way they do, but they choose to.㽶Ƶֱ

Meanwhile, Surrey Board of Trade CEO Anita Huberman sent a letter to Farnworth on Oct. 4 concerning local businesses being saddled with a bigger tax bill in 2024 on account of two police forces operating in the city with no second-phase plan for replacing the Surrey RCMP with the Surrey Police Service.

Huberman also charged that since Jessica MacDonald was appointed as the liaison between the Provincial Government and the City of Surrey in the summer, 㽶Ƶֱno public comments or materials have been released highlighting the work done thus far. We are deeply concerned with the lack of transparency and communication.㽶Ƶֱ

On that, Locke said she last met with MacDonald in August. 㽶ƵֱI believe she㽶Ƶֱs talked with some of the staff here but she hasn㽶Ƶֱt provided us with, at least that I know of, anything concrete so I㽶Ƶֱm not sure, but I do understand what the Surrey Board of Trade and Anita is talking about, and I㽶Ƶֱm concerned about it too. There is no question that the predicament that the minister has put the City of Surrey in is a very, very costly one and he may be doing it for the balance of the province, but for the City of Surrey, his decision is going to cost our residents significantly and all our taxpayers, including our business community.㽶Ƶֱ

Locke has on occasion complained that Farnworth isn㽶Ƶֱt contacting her personally. She said she last received a letter from him in mid-September. 㽶ƵֱHe㽶Ƶֱs finally admitting he doesn㽶Ƶֱt have a plan so fair enough, but somehow he wants us to create the plan and that㽶Ƶֱs difficult,㽶Ƶֱ Locke said Oct. 10.

㽶ƵֱI find it interesting they had been saying well there is a plan, we kept talking about it and now he㽶Ƶֱs saying there isn㽶Ƶֱt a plan, we need you to create the plan. Well, we have a plan 㽶Ƶֱ our plan was to keep the RCMP and he said our vision isn㽶Ƶֱt his vision so he needs to share his vision.

㽶ƵֱIt seems to me Victoria has a pretty tough time picking up the phone,㽶Ƶֱ Locke said. 㽶ƵֱI don㽶Ƶֱt know why they don㽶Ƶֱt have the courtesy of talking to a duly elected mayor and council. I don㽶Ƶֱt understand it. It㽶Ƶֱs surprising, the behaviour is very surprising.㽶Ƶֱ

㽶Ƶֱ with files from Tracy Holmes.



About the Author: Tom Zytaruk

I write unvarnished opinion columns and unbiased news reports for the Surrey Now-Leader.
Read more



(or

㽶Ƶֱ

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }