Months of sabre-rattling rhetoric between Surrey Mayor Brenda Locke and Public Safety Minister Mike Farnworth over the city㽶Ƶֱs incendiary policing transition amplified into political cannon fire this week after Locke announced on Monday the city is challenging in court the 㽶Ƶֱconstitutionality㽶Ƶֱ of the provincial government㽶Ƶֱs decision to replace the Surrey RCMP with the Surrey Police Service.
An amended petition to the one Surrey filed in B.C. Supreme Court on Oct. 13 was filed Nov. 20 and Locke characterized this move as a 㽶Ƶֱsignificant step to stop the NDP police service㽶Ƶֱ as a result of the provincial government㽶Ƶֱs 㽶Ƶֱattempted police takeover, which would require double digit 㽶Ƶֱ double digit 㽶Ƶֱ NDP tax hike on Surrey taxpayers.
㽶ƵֱWe are challenging the constitutionality of the province㽶Ƶֱs latest legislation,㽶Ƶֱ Locke said. 㽶ƵֱSurrey voters deserve to have their voices heard.㽶Ƶֱ
㽶ƵֱWe have to fight for what㽶Ƶֱs right,㽶Ƶֱ she said.
㽶ƵֱThis is not a municipal police force that we㽶Ƶֱre looking at right now,㽶Ƶֱ Locke said of the SPS. 㽶ƵֱThis is a provincial imposition on the citizens and the residents and the taxpayer of Surrey. That㽶Ƶֱs not what the voters asked for.㽶Ƶֱ
Farnworth dismissed Locke㽶Ƶֱs latest move as 㽶Ƶֱjust an example of delaying tactics by the mayor and I think all it does is cost taxpayers money and it is a waste of money and a waste of time.㽶Ƶֱ
㽶ƵֱWe have every confidence in the constitutionality of the legislation,㽶Ƶֱ he said Nov. 20. 㽶ƵֱThe decision has been made, the future of policing in Surrey is the Surrey Police Service.㽶Ƶֱ
This latest petition is aimed at the provincial government amending the Police Act last month to specify that Surrey must provide policing services through a municipal police department gave the solicitor general authority to cancel the existing agreement between the provincial government and the City of Surrey for the provision of RCMP services.
㽶ƵֱThis is absolutely a tragedy,㽶Ƶֱ Locke said. 㽶ƵֱAnd I think citizens in Surrey absolutely deserve better. I hear from them every day, they㽶Ƶֱre concerned about affordability and this is a significant impact on affordability.㽶Ƶֱ
Farnworth said at the time that the legislation also provides, 㽶Ƶֱif necessary,㽶Ƶֱ the provincial government with the ability to appoint an administrator to 㽶Ƶֱassume the functions㽶Ƶֱ of the Surrey Police Board to oversee the SPS.
Locke all but declared political war on the NDP government Monday. 㽶ƵֱThe question before the courts is whether the province has the constitutional right to do what it is attempting to do to Surrey and Surrey taxpayers with this legislation,㽶Ƶֱ she said. 㽶ƵֱI wouldn㽶Ƶֱt say I㽶Ƶֱm digging in my heels, but what I would say is I will fight for Surrey taxpayers every single day and we know that the costs are incredible.㽶Ƶֱ
Farnworth waged political war back, slamming Locke㽶Ƶֱs reference to the NDP tax on Surrey and the NDP police service as a 㽶Ƶֱcheap political shot.㽶Ƶֱ
㽶ƵֱYou know there are hundreds of men and women right now, on the ground in Surrey, who are dedicated police officers and for the mayor of Surrey to denigrate that by trying to take some cheap political shot I think is disrespectful to those men and women who put their life on the line every single day to protect the citizens of Surrey,㽶Ƶֱ Farnworth remarked, 㽶Ƶֱwhether they㽶Ƶֱre Surrey Police Service members or whether they㽶Ƶֱre RCMP. I just think it㽶Ƶֱs incredibly disrespectful.㽶Ƶֱ
㽶ƵֱFor the mayor to say that you know, oh, it㽶Ƶֱs an NDP police service, quite frankly, I think it㽶Ƶֱs a disgrace.㽶Ƶֱ
Locke was taken aback.
㽶ƵֱFor the solicitor general to use the sacrifice of police officers over a political dispute was highly, highly unusual and I would say inappropriate,㽶Ƶֱ she said. 㽶ƵֱIf the NDP don㽶Ƶֱt want to be associated with an unaffordable, disorganized police force which is what they have lined up then they can fix that.㽶Ƶֱ
Prior to the legislation being amended, Locke noted, the Police Act said local governments get to choose their police department. 㽶ƵֱThat was the Act previously, that is what they㽶Ƶֱve changed specific to Surrey and that is a massive concern to me.㽶Ƶֱ
The mayor said she was elected to 㽶Ƶֱfight㽶Ƶֱ for Surrey residents 㽶Ƶֱevery day,㽶Ƶֱ and promised that㽶Ƶֱs what she㽶Ƶֱll do. Locke said this conflict is about affordability in Surrey and dodging a double-digit tax increase for its residents. She said she㽶Ƶֱs concerned for families, seniors, 㽶Ƶֱordinary citizens and everybody that is going to be dramatically, dramatically impacted by this NDP tax on Surrey.㽶Ƶֱ
㽶ƵֱThis government does not have the right to run roughshod over every local government that doesn㽶Ƶֱt bend to their will,㽶Ƶֱ Locke said. 㽶ƵֱWhen Surrey didn㽶Ƶֱt agree with their costly plans they hastily ordered us to move forward with a very expensive and disorganized transition and when we had challenged their authority to do that, they rushed through legislation at a record pace to cover up the mistakes that they had made.㽶Ƶֱ
Locke noted that prior to the 2022 city election the provincial government 㽶Ƶֱsaid choosing a police was the city㽶Ƶֱs decision, so my team and I ran on a platform that was clear 㽶Ƶֱ we would stop the police transition and keep the RCMP in Surrey.㽶Ƶֱ
She added that after the election, the provincial government said the City of Surrey 㽶Ƶֱhad the option to put forward a plan to keep the RCMP. It is now clear that the province had other plans in mind.㽶Ƶֱ
On Oct. 13, the City of Surrey filed its first petition with the Supreme Court of British Columbia seeking a judicial review of Public Safety Minister Mike Farnworth㽶Ƶֱs July 19 order to proceed with the SPS, as the mayor continues to stands firm in the majority of council㽶Ƶֱs intention to stick with the RCMP as Surrey㽶Ƶֱs police of jurisdiction.
The provincial government has yet to file a response to Surrey㽶Ƶֱs petition with the court registry and 㽶Ƶֱfor reasons that are privileged㽶Ƶֱ cannot provide an estimated date. Respondents served in Canada are typically given 21 days to respond.
㽶ƵֱAs far as I know there hasn㽶Ƶֱt been a response filed and I will be meeting with lawyers about that very soon,㽶Ƶֱ Locke told the Now-Leader.
Farnworth on Nov. 16 temporarily suspended the Surrey Police Board 㽶Ƶֱ of which Locke was chairwoman 㽶Ƶֱ and appointed retired Abbotsford police chief Mike Serr as its replacement administrator.
Locke sees Farnworth㽶Ƶֱs move to put the 㽶Ƶֱcompletely dysfunctional㽶Ƶֱ SPB on ice and appoint an administer in its stead as a decision on his part that Surrey doesn㽶Ƶֱt need civilian oversight.
㽶ƵֱThe minister has decided that Surrey doesn㽶Ƶֱt need civilian oversight at the police board and so he suspended the entire police board,㽶Ƶֱ she told the Now-Leader. 㽶ƵֱI think there㽶Ƶֱs no question, if anyone looks back at the open part of the police board meetings, this police board was completely dysfunctional. The province knew that, the former director of police services knew that, they have apologized to me for the behaviour of the board.㽶Ƶֱ
Farnworth appointed Serr under Section 8 of the Police Amendment Act, he said, 㽶Ƶֱafter careful consideration of the work by the Surrey Police Board, which has been limited due to the lack of progress from the City of Surrey in advancing the police model transition to the SPS.㽶Ƶֱ
Locke said she doesn㽶Ƶֱt know how much Serr is being paid. 㽶ƵֱI heard it was $225 an hour.㽶Ƶֱ
She said the city of Surrey still hasn㽶Ƶֱt seen a plan from the provincial government on how the transition will move ahead.
㽶ƵֱWe㽶Ƶֱve said 㽶Ƶֱwhat is your plan?㽶Ƶֱ and they somehow think we should provide that plan and I㽶Ƶֱve said to them we have a plan, and that㽶Ƶֱs to keep the RCMP in Surrey, we gave you that plan, but we haven㽶Ƶֱt seen their plan.㽶Ƶֱ
㽶ƵֱNow they have removed civilian oversight and installed another police officer to carry out this expensive, disorganized transition. At best the province misled Surrey taxpayers,㽶Ƶֱ Locke added. 㽶ƵֱThis is not a Surrey Police Service, this is an NDP Police Service that reports to the solicitor general directly. My team and I have been clear 㽶Ƶֱ we oppose this transition and will do everything within reason to stop it.
㽶ƵֱThere is no civilian oversight, so how are we to say this is our police force? Of course this is the NDP police force, it㽶Ƶֱs the one appointed by the minister.㽶Ƶֱ
According to a City of Surrey press release, 㽶ƵֱOver the next decade, the province㽶Ƶֱs police transition is estimated to cost at least $464 million with no additional public safety benefit to the residents of Surrey.㽶Ƶֱ
Farnworth said Serr will submit a budget to Surrey by Nov. 30 and if the city says it㽶Ƶֱs not happy with the budget, 㽶Ƶֱthat goes to the director of police services for them to make a decision, recommendations or changes or what have you. That㽶Ƶֱs been in existence in the Police Act for a long time and has been used from time to time.㽶Ƶֱ