Canada㽶Ƶֱs labour minister says the federal government㽶Ƶֱs newest attempt to prevent disruptive disputes at British Columbia㽶Ƶֱs ports will lead to change this time.
Seamus O㽶ƵֱRegan promised to follow through on recommendations from a review of what went wrong during the strike this summer that stopped cargo from moving through British Columbia㽶Ƶֱs ports.
Previous studies dating back to the 1990s on the contentious relationship between the longshore union and BC Maritime Employers Association have led to multiple recommendations that were not implemented, but O㽶ƵֱRegan says this time will be different.
The minister has appointed two experts from Kingston㽶Ƶֱs Queen㽶Ƶֱs University to lead the review, asking them to identify key questions and propose terms of reference by the end of the year.
O㽶ƵֱRegan told reporters in Ottawa that when he saw the previous reports, he knew he had the responsibility to make sure the government followed up to prevent another similar port back log.
㽶ƵֱOnly because it has happened time and time again, and people have said something needs to be done in a more structural way, and so I㽶Ƶֱll do it. So, let㽶Ƶֱs see what they come up with.㽶Ƶֱ
O㽶ƵֱRegan said the goal of the latest review is to 㽶Ƶֱexamine the structural issues underlying㽶Ƶֱ the dispute that saw strike action in July, adding that Canada needs to demonstrate that it has a stable supply chain.
㽶ƵֱWe will do this by creating a structure in our port systems that can withstand the kinds of disproportionate disruptions that we saw this summer,㽶Ƶֱ he said.
㽶ƵֱA system that in no way takes away from the collective bargaining process, and provides industry and workers with the stability and the certainty that we all need to grow the economy.㽶Ƶֱ
Thousands of workers went on strike from July 1 to July 13, freezing the movement of billions of dollars worth of cargo at some of the country㽶Ƶֱs busiest ports.
A tentative deal halted that strike action, but when the union caucus rejected the contract there was a brief return to pickets on July 18, only to have that ruled illegal, sending workers back to their jobs.
A full union membership vote rejected the tentative agreement on July 28, and O㽶ƵֱRegan directed the industrial relations board to consider imposing a deal or going to binding arbitration.
Two days later, both sides announced they had reached a deal, which was later ratified.
Larry Savage, a professor in the department of labor studies at Brock University, said he thinks O㽶ƵֱRegan㽶Ƶֱs actions are designed to 㽶Ƶֱkick the can down the road㽶Ƶֱ until after the next federal election and won㽶Ƶֱt amount to much.
㽶ƵֱTo say you㽶Ƶֱre going to follow through without knowing the conclusion of the review is irresponsible, but I suspect it㽶Ƶֱs because the government knows that nothing will come of the review,㽶Ƶֱ he said.
Savage said 㽶Ƶֱtinkering around the edges of the Canada Labor Code㽶Ƶֱ won㽶Ƶֱt change the issues that led to the port strike, including concerns over automation and outsourcing, or heal the decades of animosity that has built up between the two sides.
He suspects the employers will use the review to push for the government to restrict workers㽶Ƶֱ right to strike, something that neither the minister nor the union wants.
In 1995 a task force recommended the labour minster create a panel that could provide advice on disputes with significant public interest. It argued that having the panel would balance the public interest with the desire to foster collective bargaining and reduce the appearance of political interference.
No work was ever done to implement that recommendation.
In 2010, a separate report recommended that the labour minister implement a commission to address what it called the 㽶Ƶֱexisting unsatisfactory relationship㽶Ƶֱ between the two sides at the ports.
It suggested the commission look at the appropriateness of the maritime employers as the bargaining representative for all employers, and what the resolution should be when collective bargaining has reached an impasse
㽶ƵֱThere is widespread public interest in bringing resolution to these matters,㽶Ƶֱ the 2010 report says.
㽶ƵֱLeaving them to drift is no longer a viable option when the importance of the shipping and transportation industries, to a vibrant Canadian economy, are taken into account.㽶Ƶֱ
O㽶ƵֱRegan would not say what potential changes would be.
㽶ƵֱBut the point is the stability, the point is just maintaining the stability,㽶Ƶֱ he said.
READ ALSO:
READ ALSO: