Hurricane Otis turned from mild to monster in record time, and scientists are struggling to figure out how 㽶Ƶֱ and why they didn㽶Ƶֱt see it coming.
Usually reliable computer models and the forecasters who use them didn㽶Ƶֱt predict Otis㽶Ƶֱ explosive intensification, creating a nightmare scenario of an unexpectedly strong storm striking at night. At least 27 people are dead and four missing in the destruction along Mexico㽶Ƶֱs Pacific coast, with devastation that extends for miles.
All this after Acapulco was told to expect a tropical storm just below hurricane strength. Just 24 hours later, Otis blasted ashore with 165 mph (266 kph) winds, the strongest landfall of any East Pacific hurricane.
In just 12 hours, Otis㽶Ƶֱ strength more than doubled from 70 mph (113 kph) winds to 160 mph (257 kph), also a record, as it neared the coast. And it got even stronger before it struck. Storms typically gain or lose a few miles per hour in 12 hours, though some outliers gain 30 to 50 mph (48 to 80 kph) in a day.
What happened with Otis was just plain nuts, said University of Miami hurricane researcher Brian McNoldy. But it coincides with a documented trend of because of warmer water connected to , scientists said.
Five different hurricane experts told The Associated Press they weren㽶Ƶֱt quite sure what set Otis off and why it wasn㽶Ƶֱt predicted, especially since meteorologists have been dramatically improving their intensity forecasts in recent years.
㽶ƵֱThe models completely blew it,㽶Ƶֱ said MIT atmospheric sciences professor Kerry Emanuel, a hurricane expert.
Experts point to lack of data on the storm and its surroundings and just not completely understanding what makes a storm act like it㽶Ƶֱs on steroids.
And it really matters because in Otis㽶Ƶֱ case, the storm was coming ashore when it muscled up.
㽶ƵֱIt㽶Ƶֱs one thing to have a Category 5 hurricane make landfall somewhere when you㽶Ƶֱre expecting it,㽶Ƶֱ McNoldy said. 㽶ƵֱBut to have it happen when you㽶Ƶֱre not expecting anything to happen is truly a nightmare.㽶Ƶֱ
For example, McNoldy, who lives in Miami, said a tropical storm forecast would prompt him to 㽶Ƶֱdo things like move some lightweight furniture in and take down wind chimes and things like that. That㽶Ƶֱs about it. You㽶Ƶֱre not preparing for a Category 5 hurricane.㽶Ƶֱ
National Hurricane Center Director Michael Brennan said 㽶Ƶֱthat㽶Ƶֱs a very bad scenario, populated area, rapid intensification very close to landfall, a change in the expectations about the impacts that㽶Ƶֱs happening on a time scale that doesn㽶Ƶֱt give people a lot of time to respond.㽶Ƶֱ
Brennan said Otis㽶Ƶֱ unforeseen buildup was because 㽶Ƶֱit found a much more favorable environment than we were anticipating.㽶Ƶֱ He said one part was warm water, another was that the winds 㽶Ƶֱ moving in the right direction and at the right altitude 㽶Ƶֱ allowed a somewhat raggedy storm to rapidly develop structure and strengthen.
McNoldy said there may be a mystery ingredient that scientists just don㽶Ƶֱt know right now, but water is key.
Warm water is fuel for hurricanes. Hot, deep water is like an all-you-can-eat buffet.
Globally, the world㽶Ƶֱs oceans have been setting monthly surface heat records since April. The surface waters off the Mexican coast were warm but 㽶Ƶֱnot crazy warm,㽶Ƶֱ said University at Albany atmospheric scientist Kristen Corbosiero. Bennan and McNoldy said those waters were maybe 1 or 2 degrees above normal.
Below that, the water was much hotter than usual 㽶Ƶֱand there㽶Ƶֱs just a ton of fuel out there right now,㽶Ƶֱ McNoldy said. Still, the storm didn㽶Ƶֱt linger and feed on that, which would be expected in rapid intensification, Brennan said.
The heat content in the deeper ocean worldwide has been It㽶Ƶֱs from human-caused climate change, McNoldy and other scientists said, as the oceans act as a sponge to absorb a lot of the excess heat caused by the burning of coal, oil and gas.
Otis and two other historically explosive cases of rapid intensification 㽶Ƶֱ Patricia in 2015 and Wilma in 2005 㽶Ƶֱ all happened in the same mid- to late-October time frame, when deeper water and ocean heat content is at its highest, McNoldy said.
Numerous studies have shown globally that there are than there used to be. An official definition of rapid intensification is a gain in strength of 35 mph (56 kph) in 24 hours. , many of them just before smacking land. In 2017, two devastating hurricanes, Harvey and Maria, rapidly intensified. Last month in the Atlantic, Hurricane Lee rapidly intensified from 80 mph (129 kph) to 155 mph (249 kph), but didn㽶Ƶֱt hit anywhere.
㽶ƵֱWe㽶Ƶֱre seeing so many more cases of these just astonishing rapid intensification events,㽶Ƶֱ said former National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration hurricane and climate scientist Jim Kossin, now with the First Street Foundation.
Kossin said that there㽶Ƶֱs evidence that what㽶Ƶֱs happening globally over a longer time frame is due in part to human-caused climate change but it㽶Ƶֱs hard to say that about an individual storm.
But, he added, 㽶Ƶֱthis is exactly the kind of thing we would expect to find as the climate warms.㽶Ƶֱ
MIT㽶Ƶֱs Emanuel said it might be more than just the water㽶Ƶֱs temperature, but its low salinity, too. Water in that area at this time of year is fresher from heavy rains at the surface, and that changes the mix of water temperature, he said. Normally a hurricane mixes the warm water on the surface with cooler water below. But when the surface water is fresher, a storm pulls up even more hot water from below, which feeds the storm more 㽶Ƶֱand before you know it, you㽶Ƶֱre in hot water,㽶Ƶֱ Emanuel said.
One key test of that theory is whether Otis leaves warm water in its wake. Usually, hurricanes leave behind cold water. Emanuel hopes satellite images will show it, but it㽶Ƶֱs not certain whether they㽶Ƶֱll get the right view.
Another factor that Brennan and others mention is that perhaps forecasters underestimated Otis㽶Ƶֱ original strength. That would mean it didn㽶Ƶֱt intensify as much as it appears because it was stronger to begin with.
㽶ƵֱThe East Pacific in a lot of ways is a huge data void,㽶Ƶֱ Brennan said. 㽶ƵֱThere㽶Ƶֱs no buoys. There㽶Ƶֱs very few land observations. There㽶Ƶֱs no radars along the west coast of Mexico. So we㽶Ƶֱre really reliant almost entirely on satellite imagery.㽶Ƶֱ
And sometimes satellites, looking at a storm from high above, cannot get an accurate picture of what㽶Ƶֱs going on.
Think of it like a jigsaw puzzle and forecasters at times have only 10% of the pieces, Brennan said.
Forecasters have far more tools to see what㽶Ƶֱs happening in Atlantic storms, he said.
___
Read more of AP㽶Ƶֱs climate coverage at
___
Follow Seth Borenstein on X, formerly known as Twitter at
___
Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives support from several private foundations. See more about AP㽶Ƶֱs climate initiative The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Seth Borenstein, The Associated Press