A coalition of disability rights organizations has launched a Charter challenge against a part of Canada㽶Ƶֱs law on medical assistance in dying, calling it an 㽶Ƶֱabandonment㽶Ƶֱ of people with disabilities.
The group announced Thursday that it had filed a notice of application to challenge what㽶Ƶֱs known as track two of the MAID law, which it argues has resulted in premature deaths.
Under the law, patients whose natural deaths are not reasonably foreseeable but whose condition leads to intolerable suffering can apply for a track-two assisted death. Track one, in contrast, involves MAID applications from those whose natural death is reasonably foreseeable.
The group alleges some people with disability are seeking assisted death due to social deprivation, poverty and a lack of essential supports. It argues MAID should only be available to those whose natural death is reasonably foreseeable.
㽶ƵֱA law that allows people with disabilities to access state-funded death in circumstances where they cannot access state-funded supports they need to make their suffering tolerable is grossly disproportionate,㽶Ƶֱ the coalition claimed in its filing against the federal government in Ontario㽶Ƶֱs Superior Court.
㽶ƵֱThere is no deprivation that is more serious and more irrevocable than causing someone who is not otherwise dying to die.㽶Ƶֱ
A spokesperson for the Department of Justice called MAID a 㽶Ƶֱcomplex and deeply personal issue.㽶Ƶֱ
㽶ƵֱThe government of Canada is committed to ensuring our laws reflect Canadians㽶Ƶֱ needs, protect those who may be vulnerable, and support autonomy and freedom of choice,㽶Ƶֱ Ian McLeod wrote in an emailed response to The Canadian Press. 㽶ƵֱWe will further present the government㽶Ƶֱs position in our submissions in court.㽶Ƶֱ
The coalition behind the Charter challenge includes national disability rights organizations Inclusion Canada, the Council of Canadians with Disabilities, Indigenous Disability Canada and the Disabled Women㽶Ƶֱs Network of Canada. It also includes two individual plaintiffs.
Krista Carr, executive vice-president of Inclusion Canada, said track two of MAID has shown that people with disabilities need to be far better supported.
㽶ƵֱThe law has led people with disabilities ending their lives with so much life left to live because Canada has failed and refuses to provide the support they need,㽶Ƶֱ she said at a news conference where the groups detailed their legal challenge.
㽶ƵֱThis isn㽶Ƶֱt compassion. It㽶Ƶֱs abandonment.㽶Ƶֱ
The group does not oppose MAID at large, but is against the specific track two part of the law because it 㽶Ƶֱsingles out㽶Ƶֱ people with disabilities, Carr argued.
The coalition alleges in its legal application that because track two does not require treatment options to be exhausted before accessing MAID, it may 㽶Ƶֱincentivize death㽶Ƶֱ over other options for people with disabilities.
㽶ƵֱDeath should not be a solution for disabled people who experience intolerable suffering but are otherwise not at the end of their lives,㽶Ƶֱ it argued.
Carr said there are deeper systemic issues people with disabilities face that the government should address, such as a lack of accessible housing, limited employment opportunities and discrimination in the health-care system.
㽶ƵֱWhat we need is a right to readily available disability supports and funding, not a quick and readily available pathway to a state-funded death,㽶Ƶֱ Carr said.
Heather Walkus, national chair of the Council of Canadians with Disabilities, said the government needs to do more to listen to people with disabilities.
㽶ƵֱPeople with disabilities are being not just pushed to the margins, but driven off the cliff unless services and supports are in place,㽶Ƶֱ she said in an interview.
Walkus, who has multiple sclerosis and vision loss, said she recently sought treatment for a hip injury and was asked by a medical professional, unprompted, if she㽶Ƶֱd considered accessing MAID 㽶Ƶֱ something she found 㽶Ƶֱstunning.㽶Ƶֱ
㽶ƵֱI don㽶Ƶֱt suffer because of my disability,㽶Ƶֱ Walkus said. 㽶ƵֱIt㽶Ƶֱs other people㽶Ƶֱs perceptions, it㽶Ƶֱs the physical environment, the attitudinal environment, the policies and the support services, or lack of them 㽶Ƶֱ that㽶Ƶֱs what disables me and puts me in a position of suffering, not my disability.㽶Ƶֱ